Ask Vir Ask Vir

Mrs. Joshi did not support rape in any form

I can’t be the only person to be dismayed by the turn that the Rita Bahuguna Joshi case has taken. Let me say straight out that, like most sensible people, I regard her remarks as deeply reprehensible. Rape cannot become the subject of political jousting. And to talk about the hypothetical rape of any individual is indefensible.


   By throwing the subject of rape around, Mrs. Joshi has done all women a dis-service. And she has made a mockery of the Congress’s efforts to advance the cause of women: the woman President, the woman Lok Sabha speaker etc. Her remarks would have sounded crude and offensive if they had been made by a man. But coming from a woman, they seem doubly shocking.


   But however wrong Mrs. Joshi was to speak that way, let’s clear up the misconceptions. She did not offer Rs 1 crore to anybody who raped Mayawati as some BSP leaders are claiming. She did not encourage anyone to rape Mayawati. She did not support rape in any form.


   What she meant was this: Mayawati acts as though it is enough to pay compensation of Rs 50,000 or Rs 75,000 to women who have been raped. If money is all it takes, then women should ask Mayawati how she herself would feel if she was given a crore or rupees to make up for being raped.


   It was a silly thing to say. It was offensive and insensitive. But it was not any of the things the BSP is now suggesting it was.


   Let’s also remember that Mrs. Joshi’s remarks did not emerge out of a vacuum. However shocking we find them, such statements are part of political discourse in UP. The day after Mrs. Joshi was arrested, TV channels played an old clip of Mayawati saying more or less exactly the same sort of thing about the Mulayam Singh Yadav government’s efforts to pay compensation to rape victims.


   Both statements --- Mrs Joshi’s and Mayawati ---- were offensive. But Mayawati had faced no censure when she had made her remarks.


   Two further questions remain.


   If somebody makes an insensitive statement, how does the state respond? Many of us would argue that it is enough if the person who said the stupid thing apologises  and pays the political price (losing her job or whatever)


   But Mayawati feels that this sort of statement should attract the full force of the law. Mrs. Joshi has been arrested and has been charged with non-bailable offences. Several criminal cases have been filed against her.


   Does it make any sense to set the police on a woman who makes an ill-chosen remark? Is this what the law was meant for? Would Mrs. Joshi have faced the wrath of the state if her remarks had not been directed at Mayawati but at somebody else? And why is it okay for Mayawati to make this sort of statement but not okay for Rita Joshi to say the same thing?


   The second question has to do with caste.


   Did Rita Joshi make a casteist remark? As far as I can tell the offence  was one of lack of respect for gender. It had nothing to do with caste. Mrs. Joshi’s remark could equally have been directed at a brahmin or a rajput. That Mayawati is a dalit was irrelevant.


 "If the President of the UP Congress --- the ruling party in India --- is not safe in Mayawati’s UP, then which woman is safe in the state?"

   So why then has she been charged under a law that is specifically drafted to prevent oppression of scheduled castes? Why is Mayawati claiming that dalits have been insulted? Why are her spokespeople talking in terms of upper and lower castes?


   The answer seems to be that because Mayawati is a dalit, anything that any of us says about her is an insult to dalits. Thus, if I say she is a fat crook then apparently I will be attacking India’s dalits. If I say she is the worst Chief Minister in India then I am being casteist.


  When we praise her, we are praising Mayawati. When we attack her, we are attacking dalits.


   That, at least, is how Mayawati sees it.


   If Mrs. Joshi has, as a woman, insulted all women by talking so loosely about rape then hasn’t Mayawati, as a dalit, insulted all dalits by taking on the mantle of caste victimhood to settle a few political scores?


   Which one of them has behaved worse? The woman who used a stupid parallel to make a larger point about women and rape? Or the women who cynically used caste to persecute her Congress rival?


   Of course, there’s another dimension to the whole incident. Mrs. Joshi’s point really wasn’t about some hypothetical rape. It was about the collapse of law and order in UP, about the way in which nobody was safe and about how women were at the mercy of hoodlums.


   Here’s the irony: How do you suppose the BSP responded?


   Well, it sent hoodlums to her home. When they could not find her, they torched her cars and burnt her house.


   All this, a stone’s throw from the Chief Minister’s House. And with no sign of the police.


   If the President of the UP Congress --- the ruling party in India --- is not safe in Mayawati’s UP, then which woman is safe in the state?


   Bizarrely, the BSP’s  response has  proved Mrs. Joshi’s point. I hold no brief for Mrs. Joshi. I have never met her and I condemn her remarks. But more significant than those remarks is what followed: a misuse of the law and order machinery and the worst kind of goondagiri and arson. All justified in the name of dalit honour, when the issue had nothing to do with caste.


   India’s dalits deserve better than leaders who misuse their suffering for their own gain. UP deserves better --- at the very least, it deserves a functioning government.


   And India deserves better than politicians who will stop at nothing to settle political scores.


(Picture courtesy Hindustan Times)



  • Amit 05 Aug 2009

    You may have a point .

    But What if all this was planned by Mrs Joshi to get cheap publicity ?

    She might have trying to woo both the vote banks - Upper and Dalit - who knows.

    And where was Mrs Joshi when her place was torched - Probably getting some VIP treatment at state owned Jail - having that Luxurious Tea and Snacks at tax payers expense.

  • Uttam Garg 03 Aug 2009

    Well, I am sorry for states of UP and Bihar which are housing 3 of India's worst political parties. BSP, SP and RJD. Since I have started taking interest in politics these 3 parties have done nothing except creating problems and embarassment for country and Mayawati who should have been a jewel of India as being a women CM despite being dalit, she became a huge embarrasment for country by her self glorification efforts and unnecessary use of caste card. As far as I remember, I have seen only a few state leaders who build their own statues and one of them is Saddam Hussein and we have seen the end these people meet. Probably, Mayawati should take a leaf from not so old history books and try to rectify her mistakes.

  • Kunal CH 24 Jul 2009

    The actions carried out on Mrs. Joshi were really uncalled for and this goes to show extent of goondaraj that is prevailing in UP. Mayawati being a shrewd politician once again proved the fact that she has mastered the act of twisting Dalit;s sentiments to gain cheap political mileage.At this point we should get together and criticise this act of hooliganism as much as possible so that the real picture of the dirty casteist politics that isbeing played in UP comes in front of the common people.

  • To view all please click on More Comments below
More Comments:(10)Posted On: 18 Jul 2009 12:15 PM
Your email id will not be published.
Security code:
Captcha Enter the code shown above:
Your email id will not be published.
Friend's Name:
Friend's E-mail:
Your email id will not be published.
The Message text:
This email was created by [your name] who thought you would be interested in the following Article:

A Vir Sanghvi Article Information

The Vir Sanghvi also contains hundreds of articles.

Additional Text:
Security code:
Captcha Enter the code shown above:

CommentsOther Articles

See All

Ask VirRead all

Connect with Virtwitter

@virsanghvi on
Vir Sanghvi