I know that it has become the Indian way of responding to every incident of terrorism but I am getting increasingly tired of the chorus of ‘Intelligence Failure‘ that follows each bomb blast.
Of course it is the job of intelligence agencies to keep a watch on terrorist organisations but no agency is omnipresent or omniscient.
If spy services were so good then there would never be any terror attacks anywhere in the world because intelligence agencies would have foiled them.
In fact every country that faces a terror threat has had to confront vicious attacks. The British Security Service and the Secret Intelligence Service did their best to cope with the IRA’s terror campaign during the 1970s and 1980s but bombs went off and lives were lost. The IRA even managed to bomb the hotel where Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher was staying and she was lucky to escape with her life.
The Americans have often failed spectacularly at preventing political assassinations (especially when lone gunmen are involved) and there is a long list of terror attacks, including 9/11 where their intelligence failed. Even Mossad, often admired by Indian fans for its anti terror tactics failed to anticipate the Hamas attack which led to the last war.
None of this is to deny that intelligence failures do occur. And often even when the intelligence is good, it is ignored once it is passed higher up the chain. In the case of the Mumbai attacks R&AW says it intercepted communications from the boat the terrorists were using to land in Mumbai. The transcripts were passed on — and ignored by the top people in the National Security apparatus.
And so every attack calls for a postmortem after the event. But this must be conducted calmly and forensically. Hysteria and cries of ‘intelligence failure’ may help in scoring political points but they don’t really take us forward.
In the case of the latest Delhi attack judging by the little that we know, this was, ironically enough, a tragic consequence of an intelligence triumph.
The J&K police rolled up a terror network that had the potential to create havoc and kill thousands. The quantity of explosives recovered was mind blowing and because the people who constituted part of the network were seen as upstanding citizens they could have gone about planting their explosives without attracting too much suspicion.
| "As long as the terror suspects are of Indian origin (as they seem to be in this case) Pakistan can claim that this is India’s internal affair." |
It now seems clear that the Delhi bomber was part of the network. Recognising that his fellow conspirators would give him up under interrogation he either launched a final suicide attack or tried to transport his stash of explosives which blew up unexpectedly.
It’s hard to focus only on an intelligence failure in such a case. And yes, it is tempting to point out that the Delhi police were busy roughing up and detaining protesters who were complaining about pollution when they should have been protecting citizens from terrorism. But as much as I condemn the police action against the protestors it is not fair to link this with a failure to prevent a terror attack.
All of this is important because we could be looking at renewal of a terror campaign. We know that Pakistan’s current military leadership is proudly hostile to India. We know also that their army is not going to risk a military conflict with India. The last time around, they were lucky that Donald Trump intervened before India had a chance to take the battle deeper into Pakistan. That allowed them to claim victory. But they won’t be so lucky next time so war is not in their interests.
In such a situation a revival of the terrorist movements they have fostered over the last two decades suits their purposes. As long as the terror suspects are of Indian origin (as they seem to be in this case) Pakistan can claim that this is India’s internal affair.
Our room for manoeuvre is limited.
After the last time, a military response can only be a last resort. Not only will Pakistan’s friends in the White House try and stop us but we will find it difficult to convince the rest of the world that the terrorists are armed and supported by Pakistan.
So the much maligned intelligence agencies become our best hope of limiting the attacks, fighting back and protecting India.
It is always hard to assess how well or badly the agencies have functioned because as every R&AW chief and former chief will tell you “our failures are on the front pages while our successes are kept under wraps.”
But I think it fair to say the intelligence establishment did not cover itself in glory when it was accused of hiring hitmen to kill Khalistanis. Not only was idea itself foolish and dangerous but the execution was pathetic.
I am assuming that the government has cleaned house since then. Because if our worst fears are right and a terror campaign is being planned from across the border, then the only way to foil it is Intelligence. And not the stupidity that was in evidence during the anti Khalistani operation.
Name:
E-mail:
Your email id will not be published.
Friend's Name:
Friend's E-mail:
Your email id will not be published.
Additional Text:
Security code:
Other Articles
-
It is not only the right thing to do on an intuitive level but also entirely in accordance with the principles on which this nation was founded.
-
My point is that in a country as large as ours, a numbers game makes no sense unless you look at the larger picture.
-
It is tempting to see the revolt as a failure because Pawar got nothing of consequence in Delhi. But it would be a mistake to do so.
-
This was an unnecessary reshuffle, forced on the nation by Manmohan Singh’s unwillingness to hold on to the finance portfolio.
-
And the end has an emotional power that is unusual for comic book pictures. What a pity it is the last movie in this trilogy!
See All