Vir Sanghvi
Website  Google.com
   

Very little has changed since the 26/11 terror attack


Posted By: Vir Sanghvi   |   Posted On: 21 Nov 2009 12:12 PM

Now that the first anniversary of the Bombay attacks is nearly here, this might be a good time to work out how much has changed since 26/11. In the immediate aftermath of the attacks, many of us believed that we were at a watershed in India’s fight against terror and that things could never be the same again. As we shall see, I’m not sure it has worked out that way.

 

Police/Paramilitary: Now that foreign security experts have had a chance to examine the TV footage and to analyse those terrible events, there seems to be a broad consensus that the Indian security establishment failed.

 

   There is something intrinsically shameful about a situation where ten young Pakistanis can hold India’s greatest city to ransom for nearly three days. Clearly, we took far too long to take out the terrorists and to regain control of Bombay.

 

   Much of the fault lies with the Bombay Police. Despite several acts of individual valour, it seems obvious in retrospect that these ten men were able to completely outwit and terrify the thousands of policemen entrusted with keeping Bombay safe. Experts say that the first 12 hours of a terrorist situation are crucial. In the case of 26/11, the police did virtually nothing for those 12 hours. They refused to go in to the Taj, the Oberoi or Nariman House on the grounds that the terrorists were better armed. Even when individual officers wanted to go in, their bosses pulled them back. It wasn’t till the NSG arrived the next morning that the battle against the terrorists began in earnest.

 

   You can argue that the police were given shoddy equipment. You can also say that they are not equipped to fight terrorists. Both explanations are bogus. The failures of the Bombay Police on 26/11 had little to do with equipment and everything to do with poor leadership. And in this day and age, does it make any sense for a police force not to have a SWAT team or its equivalent trained for such situations?

 

   The government has accepted that the police screwed up: the commissioner has been sacked. What is less clear is that it has made any attempt to ensure that should 26/11 happen again, the police force will be better placed to handle the situation.

 

   On the other hand, there has been a difference in the way in which the NSG is organized. The force has finally got the aircraft and equipment it required and its men are now posted in cities all over India.

 

Intelligence agencies: The reason why there have been so few terror attacks against the UK and the US in recent years is because their intelligence services are constantly monitoring terror modules and act to prevent attacks before they occur.

 

   We know now that 26/11 was preventable. R&AW had forwarded intercepts that suggested that terrorists were on their way to attack Bombay to the office of the National Security Advisor (NSA). Shamefully, the government did nothing and let the attacks happen.

 

   In the immediate aftermath of the attacks, there were calls for a reshuffle in the intelligence set-up. The government rejected these calls and stuck by the men who allowed 26/11 to happen. Since then, the intelligence apparatus has fallen into even greater disrepair.

 

   A well-researched series of articles in the New Indian Express (run by the former editor of the Sunday HT, Aditya Sinha) reveals how R&AW, India’s foreign intelligence agency, has been raped and ravaged by this government. The level of morale in R&AW is so low today that if an attack were to take place outside the CGO Complex, the spies inside would be too depressed to notice.

 

   Despite the efforts of P. Chidambaram to strengthen domestic intelligence, there is very little to suggest that India’s agencies will be able to warn us of any future attacks. Bizarrely, the government has not just allowed the decline to continue, it has allowed it to get much worse than anyone thought possible.

 

"Very little has really changed. A new terror attack like 26/11 can happen again."

Politicians: I was never a great supporter of the upsurge of middle-class anger against politicians. It seemed to me to be too knee-jerk and too unconsidered a response. The officials who had let India down kept their jobs. The politicians were sent on enforced holiday.

 

   Well, that holiday is now over. Vilasrao Deshmukh, who was removed as Maharashtra chief minister, now has a Cabinet post in Delhi. Former home minister R.R. Patil is back in the government. Shivraj Patil is about to be appointed a Governor.

 

   So, the one visible evidence of change after 26/11 – no matter how symbolic or meaningless – has now been wiped out. It’s back to business as usual.

 

US/Pakistan: In foreign policy terms, our response to 26/11 has been a failure. At the time we believed that the event was so horrific that Pakistan would stand isolated in the community of nations. And that our shared experiences would lead the US to help us in our own battle against terror.

 

   Both hopes have been belied.

 

   Whatever horror the US felt over 26/11 has long since dissipated. Under Barack Obama, America seems to be abandoning the pro-India policy of old and there is no sense in which its attitude to Pakistan has been altered by the Bombay attacks.

 

   Most disastrous of all has been our failure to successfully demand any kind of accountability from Pakistan. Our government speaks in two contradictory voices. On the one hand, our home minister keeps sending dossiers to Islamabad and threatening Pakistan with dire consequences if it continues to back terror. On the other, our Prime Minister promises eternal friendship to Pakistan and even agrees to allow India’s alleged interference in Baluchistan to be included in a joint statement suggesting a kind of parity that at once destroys the Indian position that what Pakistan has done is so horrific that Islamabad deserves to be isolated.

 

   Only one of these positions can be valid at any given time. The government cannot try both approaches simultaneously and then wonder why the Pakistanis laugh in our face and refuse to take any serious action against the men who sent the terrorists into Bombay.

 

And finally: It’s a depressing conclusion. But it is inescapable. Very little has really changed. A new terror attack like 26/11 can happen again.

 

   And our government may not be able to protect us.


 



Comments

Davesh
22 Nov 2009

A couple of more such attacks, and we will become indifferent to these attacks.Just like, we have become indifferent to corruption.It’s like developing immunity to a disease.When Rajiv Gandhi was accused in a corruption case, it resulted in Cong loosing the elections. Many termed it as the reminder to politicians that public will retaliate in its own way, if cheated.But 20 years down the line,corruption doesn't matter to us.It has a lot to do with media,which is responsible to ensure that a case like Madhu Koda reaches its logical end but breaking news of "Kota looted Jharkand" is quickly overtaken by Sachin's another century and gradually Koda fizzes out of our nation's mind.Azharudin was castigated in 2000 but he's once again a celebrity.
mayank
21 Nov 2009

Any gr8 country needs a great intelligence agency to keep it from attacks like these and to be decisive against these forces.
USSR had KGB..
USA has CIA..
what do we have RAW??? It doesn't do anything but escorts us to such attacks in regular basis..
mayank
21 Nov 2009

Hey Vir, We have heard this time and again. do u think that things will ever change. frankly speaking, i dont see anything happening. There has been no terror attack since 9/11 in US but India looks like a practice ground for these terrorists.Do u see light at the end of the tunnel. As far as I am concerned I see a light but i guess it is of tarin coming our way to put us to sleep forever.
BTW gr8 post but would have loved to see some feasible proposals for better things to happen in future...
To view all please click on More Comments below

More Comments (3) |   Share with friends   |  
 Post Comment

Your email id will not be published.
Description:

Other Articles

The government is about to screw up the airline sector again
The private airlines are complaining about government policy. Why then should they direct their ire at those who are blameless: India’s passengers?
More More
Posted On: 01 Aug 2009
Comments(7)

The West has always adopted double standards on torture
Can we bend our conception of human dignity to accommodate the demands of wartime and the fight against terror?
More More
Posted On: 29 Aug 2009
Comments(8)

The average standard of panel discussions could do with some improvement
Why are most panel discussions on Indian television so boring? Of course, this is not to say that all Indian discussions are dull.
More More
Posted On: 08 Sep 2009
Comments(16)

The only way to save Air India is to privatise it
It is almost too late for Air India. Let’s try and save it before it dies. And the only way to save it is for the government to finally let go.
More More
Posted On: 03 Oct 2009
Comments(9)

Voters are being asked to choose between competing dynasties
As politics becomes about dynasty, you make it impossible for outsiders with ideas or capabilities or even, sincerity and integrity to join the system
More More
Posted On: 26 Oct 2009
Comments(15)

Operation Bluestar was regrettable but necessary
In 1984 when the Indian army seized control of the Golden Temple, I was part of a tiny minority who regarded the operation as a disaster.
More More
Posted On: 07 Nov 2009
Comments(33)

The madman theory of politics
It’s time to stop acting like statesmen when we are dealing with cunning madmen. The only language that works is the language of strength.
More More
Posted On: 12 Dec 2009
Comments(20)

Over the last two decades, the caricature of India has altered to include the south
As far as international perceptions of India – especially at the level of caricature – were concerned, south India simply did not exist.
More More
Posted On: 08 Jan 2010
Comments(17)

I share Chidambaram’s contempt for those who seek to profit from education
Harvard, Oxford, Yale or the Sorbonne would not be what they are today if they were run on a profit-making basis.
More More
Posted On: 23 Jan 2010
Comments(23)

Can we stop being obsessed with Pakistan while Pakistan is still obsessed with us?
Pakistan must also be willing to accept that a peaceful solution that does not compromise India’s sovereignty is possible.
More More
Posted On: 13 Feb 2010
Comments(22)

It's time to open the debate on covert operations
Should we just sit back and wait for this to happen while placing our faith in the power of dialogue?
More More
Posted On: 20 Feb 2010
Comments(51)

Progress of women in society is entirely unrelated to the gender profile of Parliament
Did women advance by leaps and bounds in Tamil Nadu when Jayalalitha was in charge? Has Mayawati been good for the women of UP?
More More
Posted On: 13 Mar 2010
Comments(35)

Thailand’s troubles remind us that prosperity is no substitute for democracy
Say this for India: we have often screwed up economically. But ours is a government of the people. And we are more stable as a consequence.
More More
Posted On: 16 Apr 2010
Comments(11)

The issue is not about the principle of tapping telephones but the motive behind it
As long as there are spooks who are willing to sink low enough to please their political masters, phones will continue to be tapped.
More More
Posted On: 24 Apr 2010
Comments(14)

There are things we can learn from the British General Elections
We can run campaigns that are more closely focused on the issues and we should encourage debates.
More More
Posted On: 08 May 2010
Comments(7)

The public sector has proved unable to cope with private competition
The massive waste of tax-payer owned resources is sought to be justified on the same two dubious grounds: national pride and social obligation.
More More
Posted On: 29 May 2010
Comments(7)

It’s time to reject the bogus Aryan-Dravidian divide
The more we learn about ancient history and about the battles between Aryans and Dravidians, the more dubious this divide seems to be.
More More
Posted On: 05 Jun 2010
Comments(22)

TV Channels have brought accountability to Indian society
Politicians are extremely sensitive to anything that appears on TV. In a very real sense, they consider themselves accountable to news channels.
More More
Posted On: 22 Jun 2010
Comments(11)

It is wrong to argue that people are driven to violence because of desperation
Let’s stop making excuses for terrorists. Let’s accept that when it comes to the crunch, a murderer is a murderer.
More More
Posted On: 26 Jun 2010
Comments(13)




Let's Talk
Let's Talk Why do we label the murder of young adults by family members as 'honour killings'?



Post Your Opinion

Vir Sanghvi


<< Back to Main Page
 
I have A Question For You
Can the 'trust deficit' between India and Pakistan ever be overcome?



Poll Result
Can the 'trust deficit' between India and Pakistan ever be overcome?