Ask Vir Ask Vir
banner

Pursuits: When fans take over fiction...

I imagine that even if you have not seen the third season of Sherlock, you have read about the first episode.

The show is a homage to the Conan Doyle stories but it takes the Sherlock Holmes character and places him in today’s London and turns Watson into a veteran of the British army’s latest adventure in Afghanistan. In this version, Watson does not write up Holmes’ adventures but blogs about them.

 

   The show is a global hit largely, I suspect, because of the star quality and charisma that Benedict Cumberbatch brings to the title role — though one or two ladies of my acquaintance claim that it is Martin Freeman (the little guy from The Hobbit) who plays Watson, that they find most attractive.

 

   I’ve written about Sherlock often enough before so I won’t bore you with more details of the plots or the episodes themselves. My concern is with the Sherlock phenomenon rather than the show. At the end of Season Two, Sherlock Holmes seemingly plunged to his death after a final confrontation with Professor Moriarty.

 

   The episode was a take-off on an original Conan Doyle story in which Holmes and Moriarty both fell to their deaths in the Reichenbach Falls. Doyle had tired of Sherlock Holmes and fully intended to kill him off. But such was the public outcry that he was forced to bring him back. Holmes duly turned up in London and explained to a baffled Watson that, at the very last moment, he had executed a judo-like move and thrown Moriarty into the water instead.

 

   Nobody was convinced by the explanation. But, what the hell? It was good to have Holmes back.

 

   The problem facing the writers of the modern Sherlock was that everyone who gave a damn knew about the original Conan Doyle ploy to bring Holmes back from the dead. So the challenge was not to “kill off” Holmes (we expected that), but to do it a manner that seemed entirely convincing before explaining, at the start of Season Three, how Sherlock had faked his own death.

 

   Because there was quite a large gap between the airing of Seasons Two and Three, a whole Internet industry grew up around the how-did-Holmes-fake-it conundrum. As it is, followers of the Sherlock show are now media-savvy (Twitter explodes each time a new episode is telecast) so the obsession with Holmes' fake death became a web phenomenon.

 

   I won’t tell you how Sherlock fooled us all (no spoilers here!) but the fascinating thing for me was how the opening episode of Season Three gave the Internet speculators a role in the script. The episode contained many theories about how Holmes could have done it, borrowing from the Internet speculation, before finally telling us the real story.

 

"My guess is that as self-publishing takes off and as copyright becomes harder and harder to enforce in the digital age, everybody is going to be an author."  

   What the TV show writers were doing was accepting that fans have an important role to play in the shaping of popular fiction in today’s age of new media. It is an interesting acknowledgement. But the phenomenon of fan-fiction has been around for some years now.

 

   When Conan Doyle wrote the original Sherlock Holmes stories, Holmes was his creation and his property and he could do what he wanted with him. But in the years since Doyle’s death, the character has become the property of hundreds of script writers who have used him in stories of their own invention that have little in common with Conan Doyle’s vision. Nicholas Meyer took Holmes to Vienna to meet Sigmund Freud in the Seven Per Cent Solution; the Guy Ritchie movies have turned Holmes into Tony Stark because Robert Downey Jr now seems able to only play Iron Man; and so on.

 

   Till about a decade ago, the assumption was that if you took a much loved character (Superman, James Bond etc) and put him in the hands of an accomplished writer, either a hack or a literary figure, only then would justice be done to the character’s persona. So the first script for the Seventies’ Superman movies was written by Mario Puzo. The first non-Ian Fleming James Bond novel was written by Kingsley Amis before a spy story-hack called John Gardner was drafted to write some entirely forgettable novels.

 

   But now, TV, books and the movies are all following the lead of the comic book industry. Almost all the writers who work on the Superman and Batman books these days grew up as fans of the original comics. Because they understand the characters’ DNA, they can create new updated versions.

 

  In TV, the process began with the reboot of Dr Who by Russell T Davies who brought a fan’s approach to the iconic children’s TV character. Dr Who is now in the hands of the same writer as Sherlock (Mark Gatiss) and he brings a fan-boy approach to both characters.

 

   Now, digital media has allowed fans to get their works read and their ideas uploaded to a wider audience. The Twilight series has fan sites where anyone can post their own stories featuring the characters. (Which is how Fifty Shades of Grey started out before becoming an entirely distinct publishing phenomenon.) Every fan who believes that he or she understands a fictional character now has the means to get his or her version out to a wider audience.

 

   The phenomenon is already in existence. The significant feature of the first episode of Season Three of Sherlock is that, as befits a show written by a fan in which Dr Watson is recast as a blogger, the contributions of Internet fans has finally been tacitly acknowledged in the script.

 

   So, where will all this end? My guess is that as self-publishing takes off and as copyright becomes harder and harder to enforce in the digital age, everybody is going to be an author.  And rather than trusting Batman, James Bond or Tarzan to the owners of the copyrights, the digital world is going to hand such iconic characters over to the people who understand them best — their fans.

 

 

Posted On: 16 Apr 2014 03:32 PM
Name:
E-mail:
Your email id will not be published.
Description:
Security code:
Captcha Enter the code shown above:
 
Name:
E-mail:
Your email id will not be published.
Friend's Name:
Friend's E-mail:
Your email id will not be published.
 
The Message text:
Hi!,
This email was created by [your name] who thought you would be interested in the following Article:

A Vir Sanghvi Article Information
https://virsanghvi.com/Article-Details.aspx?key=1050

The Vir Sanghvi also contains hundreds of articles.

Additional Text:
Security code:
Captcha Enter the code shown above:
 

CommentsOther Articles

See All

Ask VirRead all

Connect with Virtwitter

@virsanghvi on
twitter.com
Vir Sanghvi